论文部分内容阅读
为进一步完善比较安全学学科体系,推动比较安全学的研究工作,从比较方法的角度研究比较安全学。构建比较安全学领域的SBCS体系,将比较划分为简单比较(S)、基本比较(B)、复合比较(C)和科学比较(S)4个层次。基于编辑学、政治学科知识,从部位、背景、模式、质量、特征、时空、属性和基础8个类别出发,将基本比较方法划分为16种,以此为基础探讨基本比较方法、综合比较方法和科学比较方法之间的关系,绘制比较方法基础图。基于比较学文献,提出比较空间和比较维度的概念。在传统比较流程基础上,引入定性的反馈特性和定量的稳定特性,构建比较安全学研究的内部比较循环和外部反馈循环双循环结构。结果表明,所构建的双循环结构有很好的兼容性,适用于各领域中的问题的比较研究。
In order to further improve the comparative safety disciplinary system and promote comparative safety research, comparative safety studies are conducted from a comparative perspective. To construct the SBCS system in the field of comparative safety, we divide it into four levels: simple comparison (S), basic comparison (B), compound comparison (C) and scientific comparison (S). Based on the knowledge of editorial and political disciplines, the basic comparison methods are divided into 16 categories based on the eight categories of location, background, pattern, quality, characteristics, time and space, attributes and foundations. Based on this, basic comparison methods and comprehensive comparison methods And science to compare the relationship between methods, drawing a comparative method based chart. Based on the comparative literature, the concept of comparative space and comparative dimensions is proposed. Based on the traditional comparison process, the qualitative feedback characteristic and the quantitative stability characteristic are introduced to build the double cycle structure of internal comparative cycle and external feedback cycle of comparative safety study. The results show that the constructed double loop structure has good compatibility and is suitable for the comparative study of the problems in various fields.