论文部分内容阅读
司法和谐的提出,不仅是对我国社会发展进入转型时期的现实及其需求的反映和积极回应,更是人民法院近10年大力推进司法改革以来的进一步总结和探索,其主要意义在于深刻地提示了司法是根植社会政治经济文化动态发展中的司法,司法改革不是甚至主要不是自身的事情,诉讼制度改革也不仅仅是法院和法官自身的事情,司法进步与社会政治经济文化发展应该是良性互动的关系。诉讼程序的改革一定要考虑当事人的因素,“不能仅仅视诉讼人为既定司法制度的消极被动的接受者,他们还是直接影响和塑造这一制度并创造制度绩效的行动者。”正是从这个意义上说,司法和谐与和谐司法虽然常常被等同使用,但还是存在着内涵和外延的差别,前者具有更大的包容性甚至包括了后者,强调了司法与社会的关系即司法的功能及其实
The proposal of judicial harmony is not only a reflection and positive response to the reality and demand of our country’s social development during the transitional period, but also the further summarization and exploration made by the people’s court since the vigorous promotion of judicial reform in the past 10 years. The main significance lies in profoundly prompting Judicature is rooted in the dynamic development of socio-political, economic and cultural justice, judicial reform is not even the main thing is not their own, the litigation system reform is not only the courts and judges themselves, judicial progress and social, political, economic and cultural development should be benign interaction Relationship. The reform of the litigation process must take into account the parties’ factors. “It is not only the litigants who are passive passive recipients of a given judicial system, but also the actors that directly influence and shape the system and create institutional performance.” In this sense, judicial harmony and harmonious justice are often used equally, but there is still a difference between connotation and extension. The former is more inclusive and even includes the latter, emphasizing the relationship between the judiciary and society, that is, the function of the judiciary And in fact