论文部分内容阅读
全国高等学校建筑学学科专业指导委员会1992年扩大会议,于1992年6月10日至13日在上海同济大学召开。建设部教育司领导、全国建筑学学科专业指导委员会成员、全国各建筑院系的代表及全国建筑学专业评估委员会成员约80人参加了会议。会议主题有三个,一是研究建筑学专业四、五年制基本培养规格;二是建筑设计教学学术研讨;三是建筑学评估委员会工作研究。其中,建筑学专业四、五年制基本培养规格的讨论较为热烈,但认识上的差异也是显而易见的,主要分歧在于建筑学专业四、五年制基本培养是否应有差异?差异何在?是质的差异还是量的差异?与会代表对基本培养规格的讨论给予了高度的重视,因为基本培养规格的确定不仅决定性地影响培养目标和教学质量,而且还涉及到诸如建筑学专业评估,建筑学专业学位的授予、注册建筑师的考试等一系列
The 1992 National Council of Architectural Disciplinary Specialist Steering Committee enlarged the meeting in Tongji University in Shanghai from June 10 to 13, 1992. Leaders of the Education Department of the Ministry of Construction, members of the National Architectural Discipline Professional Steering Committee, representatives from various architectural departments across the country, and members of the National Architectural Professional Evaluation Committee attended the meeting. There are three themes of the conference. One is to study the basic training specifications for the four or five years of architecture; the second is to discuss the teaching of architectural design; and the third is to discuss the work of the Architecture Evaluation Committee. Among them, the discussions on the basic training specifications for the four or five years of architecture majors are more enthusiastic, but the differences in understanding are also obvious. The main difference is whether there should be differences in the basic training of the four or five years architecture majors. What are the differences? The difference is also the amount of difference? The delegates attached great importance to the discussion of the basic training specifications, because the determination of the basic training specifications not only decisively affect the training objectives and teaching quality, but also related to such as architecture professional assessment, architecture professional Grant of degree, examination of registered architects, etc.