论文部分内容阅读
从《开锁》看权属关系的证明黄宏要求开锁公司打开自己的箱子,但物业经理和开锁人为防止发生法律纠纷,必须要其提供证据证明其权利人身份。而身份证、房产证等所有证件,黄宏又全锁在了箱子里,二者之间陷入逻辑悖论。到底需不需要证明权利人身份?这里涉及《物权法》的一个基本规则,即物权的公示规则。所谓物权的公示,指的是物权在设立和变动时,必须将物权设立和变动的事实通过一定的公示方法向社会公开,从而使第三人知道物权变动的
From the “lock” to see the ownership relationship proof Huang requires unlocking the company to open their own boxes, but the property manager and unlock people in order to prevent legal disputes, we must provide them with evidence to prove their identity. The ID card, real estate license and all other documents, Huang and locked in the box, between the two into a logical paradox. In the end need to prove the identity of right holders? This involves “Property Law” a basic rule, that is, the rules of publicity. The so-called property of the publicity, refers to the property rights in the establishment and changes, the real property rights must be established and changes in the facts through a certain method of publicity to the public, so that the third party to know changes in property rights