论文部分内容阅读
虽说“操行评定”的做法由来已久,但其内容在不少人心目中,远没有学生的成绩“铁”。有人认为,“操行评定”只是一块牛皮糖,可长可短,可以变形走样;有人认为“操行评定”只是商标而已:看到某些学生学业有成(中考或高考有望),就为他们贴上昂贵的标签;假如某些学生学业平平,那么,等待他们的评语将是草率从事的三言两语或片言只语。由此可见,“操行评定”在这些人心目中,仅仅是某种装饰品。说得更确切些,只是文化成绩的附属品,且同文化成
Although the practice of “assessment of conduct” has a long history, its content is in many people’s minds, far from the student’s achievements “iron”. Some people think that “the conduct assessment” is just a piece of leather candy, which can be long or short, and can be deformed and deformed. Some people think that “the conduct assessment” is just a trademark: seeing some students have academic success (probably in the middle school entrance examination or college entrance examination), They put expensive labels on them; if some students do not study at all, then waiting for their comments will be sloppy words or phrases. From this it can be seen that “the conduct of evaluation” is only an ornament in these people’s minds. To put it more precisely, it is only an accessory for cultural achievements, and it is made up of the same culture.