论文部分内容阅读
读了《育苗人》、《斯霞和孩子》,又读《<育苗人>与<斯霞和孩子>的錯誤》,有两点感想在这里谈一谈。一、“爱的教育”不能代替阶級教育。《育苗人》中强調“童心”是“純洁、稚嫩的”,“象水晶一般的明净”,因此,宣扬教师要以“童心”去爱“童心”,“和孩子們在一起为小鸡从鸡蛋里破壳而出发出快乐的笑声,为小白兔的死而流出眼泪”。这是一种什么样的观点、什么样的教育呢?我认为,这是一种超阶級的“人性论”,是向学生灌输“人类爱”、灌輸人道主义、和平主义的教育。这种教育,只是要学生“爱”,爱小鸡,爱小白兔,爱父母、兄弟、姐妹,爱“和他們一样天真、一样活泼的老师”,而不讲阶級爱,更不提阶級恨。这样长大起来的学
Read the “nursery”, “Xia and children,” and read “ and error”, there are two feelings here to talk about. First, “love of education” can not replace class education. The “nursery” emphasizes that “innocence” is “pure, innocent,” and “crystal clear as a crystal.” Therefore, teachers should be encouraged to love “innocence” with “innocence” and “be small with children Chickens hatched from the eggs out of a happy laugh, tears for the death of the white rabbit. What kind of view is this kind of education? In my opinion, this is a kind of ”class theory of human nature.“ It is an education that infuses students with ”human love“ and instills humanitarianism and pacifism. This kind of education only requires students to ”love“, love chicks, love rabbits, love parents, brothers and sisters, and love ”as naive and lively teachers like them." Without mentioning class love, not to mention Class hate. This grew up learning