论文部分内容阅读
堰功道上的十二位治水先贤中,自元代吉当普始,止于清代丁宝桢,有六位先贤围绕着都江堰的整修工程结构改革进行了许多探索,“笼石”与“砌石”方式的争论也一直贯穿其中。明代276年间,两种工程结构在都江堰的实际修整工程中交替使用;清代200多年间,皆采用“笼石”;至光绪三年(1877年)丁宝桢大修都江堰时,将鱼嘴改为砌石,于鱼嘴之前及两侧加竹笼数层防止冲刷,终于大获成功。
In the 12 flood control sages on the Weir Road, since the beginning of the Yuan Dynasty, only a few years ago, there were many explorations around the renovation of Dujiangyan’s renovation project. Among them, The debate over the “stoneworking” approach has also run through it. During the Ming Dynasty 276 years, two kinds of engineering structures were used interchangeably in the actual finishing works of Dujiangyan. During the more than 200 years of the Qing Dynasty, all were adopted “cage stone”; to the Guangxu three years (1877) when Ding Baozhen overhaul Dujiangyan, For masonry, in front of the fish head and bamboo cages on both sides to prevent erosion, finally succeeded.