近来对山水面和花鸟画的讨论很热闹,据说有些画家现在不大敢动笔,理由是:山水画和花鸟画里不会有政治内容,画出来没意思。论点与此相似,立场却又截然不同的,还有在文学上的一场争论:风景诗有没有阶级性。有人主张没有,他问道:“杜甫诗:”两个黄鹂鸣翠柳,一行白鹭上青天,窗含西岭千秋雪,门泊东吴万里船。“这有什么阶级性?堆道资产阶级说杭州是美的,无产阶级一定要说杭州是不美的吗?难道资产阶级说花是香的,无产阶级一定要说花是臭的吗?”这似乎问得很有理,看来有些人真要从此吓煞,不敢再写风景诗;也有些人要从此笑煞,其意若曰:你们提倡阶级论,说文学有阶级性,这回呢,没法答复了罢? 真的没法答复了吗?我看不一定。我们谈的是艺术作品,应该以艺术作品为限,自然界的花香不香,名胜区的杭州美不美,这是另一回事,可以按下不表。既然是一件艺术品,通过作者的主观创造,这就不可避免地带着 The recent discussions on landscapes and flower and bird paintings are very lively. It is said that some painters do not dare to write now. The reason is that there will be no political content in landscape paintings and flower and bird paintings. The argument is similar to this, but the position is completely different. There is also an argument in literature: There is no class character in landscape poetry. Some people claimed that no, he asked: “Du Fu’s poem: ” Two yellow cicadas Cui Liu, a line of egrets on the blue sky, the window containing Xiling Qianqianxue, the door parked in Dongwu Wanli ship. “What class nature does this have? The puppet bourgeoisie says that Hangzhou is beautiful, and the proletariat must say that Hangzhou is not beautiful? Does the bourgeoisie say that flowers are fragrant, and the proletariat must say that flowers are stinking?” It seems to be very reasonable to ask. It seems that some people really want to scare them and dare not write scenery poems. Some people want to smile from them. Their meanings are: If you advocate class theory and say that literature has class character, this time, Can’t answer it? Can’t really answer it? I don’t see it. We are talking about works of art, which should be limited to works of art. Flowers in the natural world are not fragrant. Hangzhou in the famous area of ​​interest is not beautiful. This is another matter. Since it is a work of art, through the author’s subjective creation, this inevitably takes