《婚姻法》最新司法解释公布后,最引人关注的条款莫过于“房子”问题——“谁付了首付款,离婚后房子归谁”、“婚后父母出资购买的房子,另一方无权分割”。此条款一出,引发轩然大波。支持和反对的声音自动分成两大阵营,势均力敌。支持者称:这可减少功利婚姻的发生率。反对者称:这无疑为婚后男人的出轨扫平了最后一道障碍。先抛开司法解释不谈,光是大家对于婚后出轨的认知便已经不够与时俱进了。 After the announcement of the latest judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law, the article of most concern is the problem of “House ” - “Who paid the down payment and who owns the house after the divorce”, “The house after the marriage was funded by the parents , The other party does not have the right to split ”. This article came out, caused an uproar. The voice of support and opposition is automatically divided into two camps, evenly matched. Proponents said: This can reduce the incidence of utilitarian marriage. Opponents said: This undoubtedly cleared the last obstacle to the derailment of married men. Regardless of judicial explanations aside, it is just that everyone's understanding of the derailments after marriage will not be enough to keep up with the times.