刘涌被执行死刑后,法学专家论证会陷入了前所未有的尴尬之中。这里先不妨作个假设:假如最高法院不对刘涌案进行提审,或者提审结果是维持死缓判决,那些批评的声音还会出现吗?也就是说,对专家论证会的否定都是据法院最终判决而提出。这就陷入了一个逻辑悖论,因为除刘涌案 After Liu Yong was executed, the legal expert demonstration fell into an unprecedented embarrassment. Here may wish to make a hypothesis: If the Supreme Court Liu Yong case is not put on trial, or the trial result is to maintain the verdict, those voices of criticism will appear? That is to say, the negation of expert testimony is based on the final court decision put forward. This plunged into a logical paradox because of the exception of Liu Yong’s case