论文部分内容阅读
自从职工“双补”工作开展以来,至今已四五年时间了。现在,怎么样评价这项“双补”工作呢?85年10月18日《工人日报》第三版发表了赵亚欣同志的文章《职工补课之我见》。这篇文章认为:“大部分参加学习的青工都有几分抵触情绪”,“处于一种为了转正定级而被迫学习的状态”,结论是:“补课现在是走了形式”。对于赵文的这种认识观点,我是不同意的。由于十年动乱的影响,几千万青年文化程度虽是初、高中毕业,但实际达不到初、
It has been four or five years since the workers’ “double subsidy” work has been carried out. Now how do you evaluate this “double-fill” work? The third edition of the Workers’ Daily on October 18, 1985, published Comrade Zhao Yaxin’s article entitled “My View on Making Ups of Workers.” The article argues: “Most young workers attending study are somewhat antagonistic,” “in a state that has been forced to learn in order to achieve positive ratings,” concluding that “make-up classes are now gone.” Zhao Wen’s point of this view, I do not agree. Due to the impact of the turmoil of the past decade, tens of millions of young people who graduated from primary and secondary schools did not actually reach primary school,