清代的乾隆、嘉庆年间,学术发展的主流是清理和总结几千年来遗留的各种文化遗产,全面整理和研究古典学术文化。乾嘉时期的史家受这种学术氛围的影响,对传统史学作了一次全面考察和重新诠释,形成了以章学诚为代表的浙东学派、以钱大昕为代表的历史考证学派和以崔述为代表的疑古辨伪学派三大史学流派,产生出“实事求是”史学思潮。长期以来,研究乾嘉史学的学者往往把“实事求是”视为乾嘉史家的治史特征和考史方法,提及这个概念时大多语焉不详,未能深入考察其内涵。尽管有 During Qianlong and Jiaqing years in the Qing Dynasty, the mainstream of academic development was to clean up and summarize the various cultural relics left over for thousands of years and comprehensively collate and study the classical academic culture. In the period of Qianjia period, influenced by this kind of academic atmosphere, historians of Qianjia made a comprehensive survey and reinterpretation of the traditional history, formed the Zhendong School represented by Zhang Xuecheng, the historical research school represented by Qian Daxin, As the representative of the three schools of history and the pseudo-pseudo-pseudo school theory, resulting in “realism ” historiography. For a long time, the scholars who studied historiography of Qian-Jia often regarded “seeking truth from facts ” as the historical feature and historical examination method of the historians in Qianlong and Jiahu. Most of the references to this concept were vague and they failed to examine their connotations in depth. Although there is