最近,有幸听了几节同课异构课——苏教版第十二册《三打白骨精》,由于参与者都是名师,故课堂节节精彩,好戏不断。可是听完课后,我对着记得密密麻麻的听课笔记发呆,总觉着课堂上欠缺些什么。思来想去,终有所悟:几节课都将唐僧解读为“不分是非、固执己见”的人,看起来是没错,但细想起来,这已模糊了唐僧本来的“面目”。事实上,历史上的真唐僧远非如此。 Recently, I was fortunate to have listened to several lectures on the same subject in heterogeneous classes - the 12th volume of the Sujiao edition, “Sanda Bajiao Jing”. As the participants were all famous teachers, the class was very exciting and the drama continued. However, after listening to the class, I was in a daze remembering the numerous listening notes, always feeling what was missing in class. Thought to want to go, finally realized: a few lessons will read the monk as “no right and wrong, stubborn ” people, it seems right, but think of it, it has blurred the original monk “face”. In fact, the true monk in history is far from it.