论文部分内容阅读
2011年8月26日上午,江苏省东台中等专业学校(原东台市职业教育中心校)在该市招标投标管理中心进行了179台教学用电脑的竞争性谈判。根据财政部门审定的采购计划,本次电脑谈判所定品牌为联想、惠普、戴尔和同方。按照以往惯例,谈判一般采用最低评标价法确定成交供应商,但此次谈判所定品牌不在同一档次上,单纯比价格,同方品牌占优。经分析研究,决定采取综合评分法确定成交供应商更加科学、更趋公平。
On the morning of August 26, 2011, Jiangsu Dongtai Secondary Vocational School (formerly Dongtai Vocational Education Center) conducted a competitive negotiation on 179 teaching computers in the city’s bidding and tendering management center. According to the procurement plan approved by the financial department, the negotiation of this computer brand Lenovo, Hewlett-Packard, Dell and Tongfang. In accordance with past practice, the negotiations generally use the lowest bidding method to determine the supplier of the transaction, but the negotiations set the brand is not the same grade, simply than the price, the same brand dominance. After the analysis and research, decided to adopt a comprehensive rating method to determine the transaction suppliers more scientific and more fair.