论文部分内容阅读
【案情介绍】1998年4月,马某发现自己承包的养鱼场经常出现死鱼现象,经县环保技术人员检测,河水中有毒化学物质含量超标。马某查看后,发现地处小河上游有一家化工厂向水库排放废液。马某随即向化工厂提出异议,未果。1998年9月、10月,马某的水库出现两次大面积死鱼,给马某造成经济损失计5000元。马某遂向县法院起诉。县法院审理后认为化工厂排污是马某承包的水库死鱼的主要原因,应负责治理污染,并赔偿损失4800元。【法律分析】本案主要涉及环境损害发生后,当事人如何寻求法律救济的问题。概而
[Case description] April 1998, Ma found himself contracted fish farms often appear dead fish phenomenon, the county environmental technicians testing, the river’s toxic chemical content exceeded. Ma view, found in the upper stream there is a chemical plant discharge waste water to the reservoir. Ma immediately challenged the chemical plant, unsuccessful. In September 1998 and October, there were two large-scale dead fish in the dam of the village of Moumou, resulting in an economic loss of 5,000 yuan. Ma then sued the county court. County court hearing that chemical plant sewage is the main reason for Moumou reservoir dead fish should be responsible for pollution control and compensation for the loss of 4800 yuan. 【Legal Analysis】 This case mainly involves the parties concerned how to seek legal remedies after the environmental damage occurs. Probably