“推门课”较之那些精心“包装”的优质课、汇报课、展示课、探究课等更能真实地反映教师的教学状况、水平以及教学效果,更能让领导或其他老师发现一些客观存在的问题,帮助授课教师提出一些有针对性的整改措施,达到相互学习、相互交流的目的。既然“推门课”是最直接反映教师课堂教学效果的一种方式,是教师自我成长最有效的途径,那它为何不受广大教师的欢迎呢?我看原因还是出在校长(领导)身上: “Push the door class ” Compared with those carefully “Packaging ” quality class, report class, display class, inquiry class and more truly reflect the teacher’s teaching situation, level and teaching effectiveness, but also to enable leaders or other Teachers found some objective problems, to help teachers put forward some targeted corrective measures teachers to achieve mutual learning, mutual exchange. Since “push a class” is the most direct way to reflect the effect of classroom teaching teachers is the most effective way to self-growth, then why it is not welcomed by the majority of teachers? I think the reason is still the principal (leadership ) Body: