论文部分内容阅读
在现代日语中,对“ノニ”和“テモ”的研究大多都是从语用论和构造论等方面展开的,而对于同作为逆接确定用法的“テモ”和“ノニ”进行的对比研究并不多。本文在这一事实的基础上,分别从后件疑问句机能的变化、与否定终助词“な”的共起、后件的省略这三个方面对“テモ”和“ノニ”的特征进行分析。经考察发现,“ノニ”后的疑问句疑问机能变弱,句末的“ナ”关系全句,其前件和后件的关系较为紧密,后件不能省略。而“テモ”后的疑问机能不变,其前后件之间关系相对灵活、疏松,“ナ”只能关系到后件,后件可以有省略的现象。
In modern Japanese, most researches on “ノ ni ” and “テ モ ” are carried out from the aspects of pragmatics and tectonics, etc. However, for the study of “モ モ” and “ノ ni ”conducted by the comparative study is not much. On the basis of this fact, based on this fact, this article respectively analyzes the changes of the function of the interrogative questions, the coexistence of the final adverbial “” and the omission of the postconditions, “the” “Characteristics of the analysis. After investigation, it is found that the interrogative question function after ”ノ ni “ becomes weakened and the sentence at the end of sentence ”ナ “ has a close relationship with its antecedent and consequent, and the consequent can not be omitted. However, the question function after ”Temoo“ remains the same, the relation between the front and back parts is relatively flexible and loose, the ”ナ " can only relate to the post-part and the post-part can be omitted.