关于康有为的碑学主张,“尊碑抑帖”已成共识。但是,目前对康氏书学的研究多停留在书论文本的层面,偶有涉及变法及其对现代进程的推动,对其书学与变法思想的内在联系和差异,以及为何确立以篆隶为古之本原,“二王”何以被排除在所抑之帖的行列之外的认知尚存在偏差和不足。本文将尝试从康氏的政治革新入手,来探讨碑学建构中的变古进程,并进一步阐释其在“坚守”与“裂变”之间的历史困境和折中取舍。 On Kang Youwei’s tablet advocacy, “respect monument suppression” has become a consensus. However, the current study of Kang’s book study stays at the level of the book of calligraphy. Occasionally it involves the change of law and its promotion of the modern process, the internal relations and differences between his book study and the thought of changing the law, For the ancient primitive, “two kings ” why is excluded from the ranks of the suppression of the posts there are still some deviations and deficiencies. This article will attempt to start with Kang’s political reform to discuss the process of turning pale into ancient ones and further explain his historical predicament and compromise between “sticking to” and “splitting up”.