论文部分内容阅读
通过几代人的探索,对中国古代家具的鉴定,目前已有些规律可循。但中国古代家具历史悠久,流派众多,量若繁星,故在鉴定活动中,仍会不时遇到些有悖常理的困惑,有待我们继续地探讨解决。通过古家具上的题款来判定其制作年代,应是最直接的断代方法了。但实际上,与瓷器书画等古物不同,古家具上的题款极为罕见,又常为堂款或名款,年款则更为稀少。常使人诧异的是,有些家具题款所示的年代却往往与其造型的时代风貌并不相符,令人困惑。
Through several generations of exploration, the identification of ancient Chinese furniture, there are some laws to follow. However, since ancient Chinese furniture has a long history, numerous schools and an abundance of stars, it is still not uncommon for us to encounter some perverse confusion in identification activities pending our continued discussion and solution. Through the inscriptions on ancient furniture to determine its production time, should be the most direct dating method. However, in fact, unlike antique paintings such as porcelain and calligraphy, ancient inscriptions on inscriptions are extremely rare. Often surprising is that some of the furniture, the age of the inscriptions are often inconsistent with the style of the times, confusing.