……我们可以申言:不存在对某文本的难以更改的绝对性阅读,也不存在独一无二的意义。我们也不认为,在一定的历史时期内唯一有效的解释。一切的解释,只要在文本中找到相应的理由,便或多或少是合理的;因此,一切的解释都是相互补充的,即使它与最初的解释相对立。这并不是说,一切合理的解释都是等值的。有些解释仅仅与另一些已经声誉卓著的解释略有差异,还有一些解释显示了新的前景,可能会有重要的新发展。文学批评不管怎样客观,它总是可以丰富文本。如果一部作品的意义是客观存在 ... We can assert that there is no unreadable absolute reading of a text, nor does it have a unique meaning. Nor do we think that in the certain historical period the only valid explanation. All explanations are more or less reasonable as long as they are found in the text; therefore, all interpretations are complementary, even if they contradict the original interpretation. This does not mean that all reasonable explanations are equivalent. Some interpretations differ only slightly from those that have been reputable, and others explain new prospects and may have important new developments. No matter how objectivist, literary criticism can always enrich the text. If the meaning of a work is an objective reality