“一个女人之为女人,与其说是天生的,不如说是形成的”。波伏娃这句名言在觉醒的女性之间广为流传。她否定了任何先天的生理决定论,批判了女人天生不如男的偏见,对于我们认识自己被父权制文化强制定位于“第二性”的生存处境,具有振聋发聩的作用。可是波伏娃没有说出女人在被形成这样的女人之前是什么,没有能够从文化层面回答我们从哪里来又到哪里去的问题。理安·艾斯勒的文化人类学和未来学著作《圣杯与剑》对此 “A woman is a woman, rather than born, as it is formed ”. Beauvoir’s famous phrase among the awakening of women widely circulated. She denied any innate physiological determinism and criticized the prejudice of women as innocent as men. She was very enlightened by our understanding that she was forced to be forced into a “second nature” by patriarchal culture. But Beauvoir did not say what the woman was before she was made such a woman, and there was no question of being able to answer culturally where we came from and where we were going. Cultural Annihilation and Futurology by Rian Eisler “Holy Grail and Sword” Against it