论文部分内容阅读
依据逻辑学最常用的一种下定义的方法——“属加种差定义”,我们姑且对“期刊风格”作如下界定:它是指期刊在整体上表现出来的相对稳定的成熟的编辑特色。由此可宽,“期刊风格”与“期刊编辑特色”是种属关系。我们选择“期刊编辑特色”作为‘期刊风格”的邻近的属,这意味着“特色”包含“风格”,这两个概念的关系是一种逻辑上的“真包含关系”,即“特色”的部分外延与“风格”的全部外延重合。这就表明,凡期刊有独特风格的,必有鲜明的特色,即风格就是特色;可以说,没有特色就不成其为风格。但是上述命题的逆命题是不能成立的,我们不能说:“有特色必有风格,没有风格也就没有特色,特色就是风格。我们认为,风格与特色不是两个对等的概念,它们的关系是种与属、特殊与一般的关系。
According to the most commonly used definition of a logic method - “plus plus difference definition”, we tentatively define the “journal style” as follows: it refers to the journals in the overall performance of the relatively stable and mature editorial characteristics . It can be wide, “journal style” and “journal editorial characteristics” is a genus relationship. We choose “journals editing characteristics” as the adjacent genus of journals style, which means that “characteristics” include “style”, the relationship between these two concepts is a logical “true containment”, that is, “characteristics” Part of the extension and the “style” of the total extension of coincidence.This shows that all journals have a unique style, there must be a distinctive feature, that is, style is the characteristic; can be said that there is no feature is not a style, but the inverse of the above proposition Proposition can not be established, we can not say: "there must be a distinctive style, there is no style, there is no feature, the characteristic is the style. In our opinion, style and characteristic are not two concepts of equivalence. Their relations are kind and special and general.