论文部分内容阅读
拙文《甲骨卜辞的命辞》(《汉语学报》2011年第3期),与《再论甲骨卜辞的命辞》(《汉字文化》2013年第6期),分别从甲骨卜辞文本和田野调查样本两个不同角度论证甲骨卜辞命辞是陈述句,而不是疑问句,命辞内容记录的是贞人或商王的占卜预测结果,而不是对神龟发问的记录。本文尝试从类型学的角度对甲骨卜辞命辞进行探讨。一、甲骨卜辞命辞分类关于甲骨卜辞的分类,以主题类别来分类的做法最多,而影响最大的非《甲骨文合集》莫属。《甲骨文合集》分类总目如下:
(“Chinese Journal” 2011 the third period), and “resurgence of inscriptions Oracle Inscriptions” (“Chinese Character Culture” 2013 the sixth period), respectively, from the inscriptions Oracle bone and field survey sample Two different angles argue that the inscriptions on the inscriptions on the inscriptions on the inscriptions of the inscriptions on the inscriptions on the bone are statements rather than interrogative sentences. The contents of the resignations record the predictions of the divination of the inscriptions on the virgin or Shang, not on the records of the inquiry. This article attempts to explore the inscriptions of Oracle Bones from the perspective of typology. First, the Oracle Bones reshuffling classification On the Oracle bone inscriptions classified to the theme category to the most practice, and the most influential non-“Oracle Collection” is none other than. The “Oracle Collection” category is as follows: