论文部分内容阅读
关于谶纬名义,有唐以来大抵形成了“谶纬有别”和“谶纬无别”两种观点,且后者有取代前者而成为定论之势。本文认为,谶纬名实的分合、演变十分复杂,“有别”、“无别”二说均失于粗陋,都缺乏史实的详确证明。鉴于今存谶纬佚文零散错乱、难以自足呈现谶纬原貌之实际,只有从历史(谶纬之基本史实、汉人的语言实践和政治、思想文化环境等)演变的角度,翔实考察谶纬之名实如何分合、纠结,才可能得到准确的理解。
As for the notion of weft knuckles, since the Tang dynasty, it has probably formed two kinds of views: “there is no difference” and “no difference”, and the latter has become the conclusion of the trend by replacing the former. This paper argues that the division and integration of the name and reality of the latitude and longitude are very complicated and that both “different” and “none other” both fall into rudeness and lack the detailed proof of historical facts. In view of the scattered and disorderly confusion of the present and the present, it is difficult to present the truth of the original appearance of the weft. Only from the perspectives of history (the basic historical facts of the weft, the language practice of the Han Chinese, the political, ideological and cultural environment, etc.) , Tangled, it may get accurate understanding.