论文部分内容阅读
“拿来主义”往往是很轻松的,择取一两个典型为我所用,似乎便可以自圆其说。其实,很多时候这正犯了以偏概全的错误,表面上的唯物论掩盖着实质上的唯心观。4月16日新华社播发的《安徽有200万人脱盲》一稿,便犯了类似的错误。这条消息选择了这样一正一反两个典型:一是一养鱼专业户,“因没有文化不懂养鱼技术,造成鱼死塘干,损失惨重”;而另一回乡知青,“因有文化,又到技校学习了养鱼技术,一年净赚一万多元”。仅此而已,记者就试图说明脱盲与致富具有必然联系,难以令人置信。且不说可能由于一些偶
It is often very easy to take “usedism”. It seems as if I can choose one or two typical examples for my own use. In fact, in many cases, this is a crime that has been totally neglected. On the surface, the materialism conceals an essentially idealistic view. On April 16 Xinhua News Agency broadcast a “draft of 2 million people in Anhui province literacy”, they made a similar mistake. This message has chosen such a positive and negative two typical: First, a fish farming households, “because there is no culture do not know fish farming techniques, resulting in dead fish dry pond, suffered heavy losses”; and another educate youth, “because A culture, went to technical school to learn the fish farming technology, net profit of more than ten thousand yuan a year. ” And nothing more than this, journalists try to illustrate the inevitable connection between literacy and getting rich, unbelievable. Not to mention may be due to some even