论文部分内容阅读
思想教育作为一种实践活动，对它的评价应该是管理学和社会学双重标准的统一，也就是要坚持目标标准和社会效果标准的统一。而在具体的操作层次上，又必须在这两重标准的原则指导下制定出具体的评价指标体系。评价过程分为“测”和“评”两个环节。在大多数情况下，二者不能合一。此时，是“解释”而不是“测量”决定了评价的结果。评价分数偶像化是目前实践中比较普遍的倾向，不利于发挥评价的教育作用。而思想教育测评的教育意义，必须依赖于测评的全过程才能体现。其中最重要的就是评价指标体系的内容设计和权重分配。
Ideological education as a practical activity, its evaluation should be the unity of the double standard of management and sociology, that is, to adhere to the unity of the target standard and the social effect standard. However, at the specific operational level, we must formulate a specific evaluation index system under the guidance of the principles of these two standards. Evaluation process is divided into “test” and “assessment” in two areas. In most cases, the two can not be one. At this point, “interpretation” rather than “measurement” determines the outcome of the evaluation. The appraisal score idolization is a common tendency in practice at present, which is not conducive to giving play to the educational role of appraisal. The educational significance of the ideological education evaluation, we must rely on the whole process of evaluation can be reflected. One of the most important is to evaluate the content of the index system design and weight distribution.