单纯一种离婚准则的改变,怎么会产生如此深远的影响?为什么一种旨在创造更加平等的财产分割的法律改革,却会以使得离婚妇女及其子女陷于穷困而告终? 当我刚刚开始这项研究时,我曾经以改革者的乐观主义态度假定,加利福尼亚的无过失离婚试验只能产生积极的结果。它不会仅排除那令人感到羞耻的证言,还法庭以尊严,而且还会促进公正、平等地解决离婚夫妻的经济纠纷。我相信,新法律所寻求的相互敌意和刻毒的消除,还会促进当事者双方在离婚后共同抚养子女方面的合作能力。此外,新法律要求实现男女在法律上平等,从而消除那种认为妇女应当处于服从地位的时代错误,承认妇女在婚姻关系中的完全平等地位。 How could a far-reaching change be caused by a change in a divorce guideline alone and why one legal reform aimed at creating a more equitable division of property would end up in a state of destitution for divorced women and their children? When I was just starting In my research, I had assumed in the optimist attitude of the reformers that the no-fault divorce test in California had only positive results. It will not exclude only the shameful testimony but also the dignity of the tribunal and will promote the just and equitable resolution of the economic disputes between the divorced spouses. I believe that the mutual hostility and the elimination of carving marks sought by the new law will also promote the ability of both parties to cooperate in raising children after divorce. In addition, the new law requires that men and women be legally equal, thus eliminating the mistakes of that time that women should be obeyed and recognizing the full equality of women in their marriage.