论文部分内容阅读
过去30多年间西方管理学界对于企业的政治行为进行了广泛的研究,但是这些研究多把注意力放在企业政治行为的总体活跃度上,较少关注企业政治战略或战术的组合,以及这些组合的影响因素。针对这一问题,本文运用比较案例分析的方法就行业的被管制压力与其企业政治战略战术运用的关系进行了实证研究。结果显示:被管制压力显著地影响着企业政治战略战术组合的复杂性及特征。行业的被管制压力越大,其中的企业采用的政治战略及战术种类就越多,行动的透明度越低,更具有强制性和间接性,这些战略和战术也被使用得更为频繁,行动也更具有持久性和长期性,并且企业的政府关系职能部门更正规,专职人员的队伍更庞大,企业也更善于随机应变地采用单独或集体的行动。
For the past 30 or so years, Western management scholars have conducted extensive research on the political behavior of enterprises. However, most of these studies have focused on the overall activity of corporate political behavior with less attention on the combination of corporate political strategies or tactics, The impact of factors. In response to this problem, this article uses a comparative case study to conduct an empirical study on the relationship between regulated pressure in the industry and the strategic use of its business strategy. The results show that the pressure of regulation significantly affects the complexity and characteristics of corporate political tactics and tactics. The greater the regulated pressure on the industry, the more political tactics and tactics employed by the firms involved, the lower the transparency, the more mandatory and the more indirect the actions, the more frequent the use of these strategies and tactics, and the more action More permanent and more permanent, and with a more formal and dedicated government staff in a company’s corporate functions, with a larger contingent of employees and greater organizational responsiveness to individual or collective action.