论文部分内容阅读
多年来,有一个问题闷在心里,就是中国画在国际上地位不高,这地位包括市场价位。拿毕加索和齐白石比较,都是大师级人物,可毕加索的作品动辄几千万美元,而齐白石的精品在10年前尚不及毕加索的零头。前些年同道们在一起喜欢争论中西绘画谁优谁劣的问题,甲能说出毕加素一百个伟大,乙也能说出齐白石一百个伟大,甚至更多,但一说到市场价格,就不好争论了。价格就是价格,明摆着无须争论。甲一句话就使乙思考半天:齐白石伟大,为什么不值钱? 幸喜近年齐白石作品价位一路飙升,其《诗意山水册》1998年价位159万元,2003年价
Over the years, there is a problem boring in the heart, that is, Chinese painting in the international status is not high, this position includes the market price. Take Picasso and Qi Baishi comparison, are the masters, Picasso works easily tens of millions of dollars, while the quality of Qi Baishi less than 10 years ago, Picasso’s fraction. A few years ago, fellow-artists like to debate the question of who is superior and who is inferior in Chinese and Western painting. A can say one hundred great things about Picasso, and one hundred great and even more about Qi Baishi. But when it comes to the market Price, it is not good debate. Price is the price, obvious need not argue. A sentence to think about a long time: B Qiashi great, why not worth? Fortunately, the work of Qi Baishi works in recent years soaring prices, the “Poetic Landscape” in 1998 price of 1590000 yuan, 2003 price