论文部分内容阅读
在快播案庭审中,被告快播方以“技术中立”为立足点进行的自辩受到广大公众的关注,技术证据链的不完善使此案目前仍处于有待再审阶段。通过对以快播播放器为代表的网络技术媒介在当代文化传播中重要地位的分析,该文指出由前网络到网络时代,作品内容版权在社会文化塑造中力量的衰落,建议借此案庭审的机会,推动关于版权利益在不同技术/意识形态媒介间重新分配的机制和新技术使用者伦理责任限度的讨论,避免文化向技术投降。
In the fast-track court trial, the defendant’s fast-tracker’s self-defense based on “technology neutrality” received the public’s attention. The imperfection of the technical evidence chain left the case still awaiting retrial. Through the analysis of the important status of network technology media represented by fast broadcast players in the contemporary cultural communication, this article points out the power decline of the content copyright in the social and cultural shaping from the former network to the internet age, To promote discussion of the limits of ethical liability of users of new technologies regarding the redistribution of copyright interests between different technology / ideological media and to avoid the surrender of culture to technology.