论文部分内容阅读
我国在法律上主要有三种处理劳动争议的方式,即调解、仲裁、裁判。在制度的应然性设计中,仲裁在劳动争议的解决过程中显然应该处于中心地位,而调解和裁判则起到补充、辅助作用,三者相辅相成而又主次分明。然而,这样的制度设计在现实运作中却多为实务界、理论界所诟病。笔者在对这样的现象加以分析之后将问题归纳为:调解虚置化、仲裁伪中心化、裁判初始化三个方面的问题。此外,结合借鉴英国的ACAS劳动争议解决制度,笔者认为应该在现实制度运作中对相关的制度加以改革,确保仲裁中心主义在劳动争议解决机制中的实现,以保障劳动争议当事人的合法权利与劳动争议解决机制的有效运行。
My country mainly has three ways to deal with labor disputes in law, namely mediation, arbitration and adjudication. In the proper design of the system, arbitration should apparently play a central role in the process of resolving labor disputes, while mediation and adjudication play a complementary and auxiliary role. The three are complementary and the main and secondary are distinct. However, the design of such a system is often criticized in practice by theorists for its practical operation. After analyzing such phenomena, the author summarizes the problems as follows: the mediation of virtualization, the arbitration of pseudo-centralization, the referee initialization three issues. In addition, in reference to the ACAS labor dispute resolution system in the United Kingdom, I think it is necessary to reform the relevant system in the operation of the real system to ensure the realization of arbitration centrism in the labor dispute resolution mechanism in order to protect the legal rights and labor of parties involved in labor disputes Effective operation of dispute resolution mechanism.