论文部分内容阅读
笔者在《政治经济学的对象和生产关系的内涵》(载《华中师院学报》1980年第4期)一文中,对生产关系作了三个角度和三种分类的分析(以下简称“两重三分法”),并拟制了一个生产关系内涵与所有制关系的示意图。当时这样作的直接目的是为了阐述生产资料所有制是包括在生产关系之内的——这样一个论断,对于“两重三分法”的一般意义,则没有来得及论述。本文想从这个意义上就以下两个问题加以补述。第一个问题:“两重三分法”从第三角度看生产关系,把企业管理(这里,暂把它作生产管理与经济管理的统称)纳入生产关系的范畴。这样做,对于理解企业管理的客观性质及其所反映的各种复杂的经济关系是不无裨益的。在已出版的经济学著作中,从第一角度和第二角度,即从广义与狭义来看生产关系是比较普遍的,这里并无笔者的新的创造。(我在这里用“角度”这个概念,其本意是
In one article entitled “The Connotation of the Objects of Political Economy and the Connotation of the Production Relationship” (Journal of Huazhong Normal University, No. 4, 1980), the author analyzes the relations of production from three perspectives and three categories (hereinafter referred to as “two Heavy third ”), and draw up a schematic diagram of the relationship between the connotation of production relations and ownership. The immediate purpose of doing so at that time was to elaborate on the ownership of the means of production as being included in the relations of production - such an assertion as to the general significance of the “two-trichotomy,” without having had time to elaborate. This article would like to make the following two questions in this sense. The first question: The “two-part and one-third” approach regards the relations of production from the third perspective and includes the scope of the relations of enterprise (here, for the time being, it is collectively referred to as production management and economic management). In doing so, it will not help to understand the objective nature of business management and the complex economic relations it reflects. In the published works of economics, from the first and second perspectives, that is, the relations of production in both general and narrow terms are relatively common, and there is no author’s new creation here. (Here I use the concept of “angle”, the original meaning is