记得在儿子出生后不久,我和妻子就为儿子的吃、穿问题有过一番争论,争论的焦点有二:其一,是定时定量喂奶,还是孩子什么时候饿了就什么时候给他吃;其二,应该穿多一些,还是穿少一些。儿子大些以后,需要增添辅助食品,结果又为添什么食品,添多少,怎样喂而争论。我自然还是主张以书上的记载为准,科学资料嘛,具有权威性;而妻子则更多地相信孩子姥姥的建议,何况我的儿子出生头十个月就是由姥姥喂养的,这也是一个有力的佐证。自然,这种争论照例不会有多少结果。因为我们无法比较按照各自的主张喂养儿子可能带来的长远后果。孩子更大一些后,就可以独自吃饭了,我想争论可以结束了吧!但是,情况远非我想象的那样简单,新的争论接踵而来。这次争论的焦点变成了对 I remember that soon after my son was born, my wife and I had controversy over their son’s problems with eating and drinking. There were two points of contention: First, when is the time-specific nurse, or when does the child give him food when he is hungry? ; Second, should wear more, or wear less. After the older son, the need to add supplementary food, the result is added to what food, how much to add, how to feed and argue. I naturally still advocate the book records prevail, scientific information Well, authoritative; and his wife is more believe my grandmother’s proposal, not to mention my son was born the first ten months is fed by the grandmother, which is also a Strong evidence. Naturally, this argument as usual does not have much effect. Because we can not compare the long-term consequences of feeding our sons according to their own claims. After the children are bigger, they can eat alone, and I think the argument can be over! However, the situation is far from as simple as I thought, new controversies ensued. The focus of this debate has turned out to be right