文章针对杨旭升文提出的两个问题进行辩驳。其一，“季札观乐”的真实性不能抹杀，孔子之前《诗经》确已结集，而《诗经》中可能系由孔子增入的周平王以后的作品，不及全书八分之一，因此只能称孔子为《诗经》的补编者而不是主编者。其二，众多文献记载表明《诗经》全为乐歌，《诗》乐是历史上的客观存在，而非“自构的理念”。 The article rebutted two questions raised by Yang Xu Shengwen. First, the authenticity of “Jizha’s view of music” can not be denied. Before the Confucius, the Book of Poetry was indeed collected. Later works of the Zhou Dynasty, which may be added by Confucius, are less than one-eighth of the whole book Confucius can only be called the “Book of Poetry” supplement editor rather than editor. Second, many records show that “the Book of Songs” is all music, “poetry” music is the history of objective existence, rather than “self-constructed concept.”