论文部分内容阅读
源于对同一主体学术影响力评价的认识,新型的下载频次指标与当前主流的被引频次指标应具有内在的统一性,但用户认知水平和行为方式的不同以及引用和下载的不同决策模式及其在文献利用行为中的不同地位决定了两者的差异。基于CNKI期刊库,从论文、期刊和机构三个层次考察两种指标的分布状态,分析两者之关联乃至引用与下载的行为特点,研究下载频次所呈现的特征并与被引频次比较,以考察其作为评价指标的合理性和可用性。
From the understanding of the academic evaluation of the same subject, the new download frequency index and the current mainstream of the Citation Index should have an internal unity, but the level of cognitive behavior and behavior of different users and different reference models and download decision-making And their different positions in the use of literature determine the difference between the two. Based on the CNKI periodical library, this paper examines the distribution of the two indicators from three levels of theses, periodicals and institutions, and analyzes the characteristics of the association and even the citation and downloading of the two. It also studies the features presented by the download frequency and compared with the quoted frequency Examine its rationality and usability as an evaluation index.