“在罗马法、中国法以及各类比较法的丛书风靡学术界的同时,在‘依法治国’盛行的今天,在大力提倡借鉴外国法治经验的趋势下,作为另一法系的英国法的历史却仍然是一片空白,这无论如何和我们的需求、愿望不符,所以在这个领域所需要做的也许才刚刚开始。”李红海先生就是这样一个开始者。我们看到,无论是大陆法系的大家,还是英美法系的巨儒,在进行体系研究时,总没有脱离对两大法系加以比较的成规——而比较往往都是进行一番或长或短、或深或浅的历史考证而后作出定论。万千结论其实质近乎一致:普通法源流并彰显于判例法,大陆法系出自并弘扬于罗马法。李红海先生也作历史考证,然而 While the books of Roman law, Chinese law and various comparative laws are popular in academia, at the same time that the rule of law is prevailing, the British law as another legal system under the tendency of vigorously promoting the experience of foreign rule of law History is still a blank space, which is inconsistent with our needs and wishes anyway. Therefore, what we need to do in this area may have just begun. "Mr. Li Honghai is such a beginning. We have seen that neither the civil law system nor the jurists of Anglo-American law systems have always departed from being able to compare the two legal systems when conducting system research - Short, or deep or shallow historical research and then make a conclusion. The conclusions of a thousand concords are almost identical: the origin of common law originates in case law, and the civil law system derives from and promotes the Roman law. Mr. Li Honghai also made historical research, however