对于文论界“符码”、“耗散”、“解构”等西式术语的盛行,对于“新”、“后”、“前卫”、“晚生代”之类命名划代的愈炒愈热,我常常不以为然。不是说其中毫无真知灼见,问题在于那种鹦鹉学舌的效仿与照搬,在于把新名词堆砌当作“新思维”当作先锋与新潮。然而,“新状态文学”或“文学新状态”的 As for the prevalence of western terminology such as “Symbol”, “Dissipation” and “Deconstruction” in the literary circle, the more hot and hotter the nomination of “new”, “back”, “avant-garde” and “late generation” I often disagree. Not to say that there is no insight, the problem lies in the kind of parrot tongue imitation and copying, lies in the new piling up as “new thinking” as a pioneer and trendy. However, “new state literature” or “new state of literature”