Environmental education:Bringing an Indigenous Eco-justice and social justice worldview back to Reco

来源 :The Fifth Annual International Conferenceon Reciprocal Learn | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:njbbbb
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  As a Social Justice Education student,and also as a newcomer to Canada,I have found studies about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada(TRC)and Indigenous worldview intriguing.Learning about the TRC has given me great opportunities to understand reconciliation.It also offered me an in-depth understanding of the background of colonialism and the contemporary impact of neoliberalism.This insight has helped me to articulate ways of not only rethinking education as one effective solution,but also challenging me to think of education from an Indigenous Eco-justice and social justice perspective.Thus,I would like to explore how adopting Environment Education based on the Indigenous Eco-justice and social justice can positively play a significant role in the process of reconciliation.I see this as beneficial to rebuilding the sustainable and respectful relationship between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.Therefore,in this paper,I will explore 3 significant concepts that highlight the Indigenous Eco-justice and social justice perspective in the process of reconciliation: the self-determination of Indigenous communities,Indigenous womens empowerment and most significantly,Indigenous youth education.Specifically,in the third section,I will illustrate why Environmental Education towards Indigenous youth education is an effective way to practice TRCs ?calls to action on reconciliation.This can be significantly helpful to practice the Indigenous Eco-justice and social justice worldview on rebuilding the respectful and sustainable relationship between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.First of all,Land-based Environmental Education can be an effective way to promote the self-determination of Indigenous communities.Secondly,Water-based Environmental Education can be a practical solution for Indigenous womens empowerment.In addition,Art-based Environmental Education can play an important role in Indigenous youth education.In doing so,I would like to explore Environmental Education,as a way of reconstructing an Indigenous Eco-justice and social justice worldview,can strengthen the reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.
其他文献
本文基于中国-加拿大教师教育和学校教育互惠合作学习项目,以项目中三种不同类别的参与者为研究对象,即专家导师、姊妹校教师、研究生。搜集他们在参与项目过程中的会议记录、反思日志为研究数据,通过文本分析法、访谈法,研究这三类参与者在参与项目的 过程中的收获与反思,遇到过的问题、解决问题的方式、以及目前亟待解决的问题。归纳出跨文化互惠学习项目的动力源泉与阻碍因素、经验与反思。也进一步清晰三种不同类别参与者
With the acceleration of globalization,exchanges between China and the international community on education and culture have become more frequent.This provides a platform and foundation for schools to
This paper holds the point that teachers professional live is different from daily life and work life,and is one of the effective ways to promote professional development of teachers.Teachers profes
As part of the SSHRC partnership grant on Reciprocal Learning between Ontario,Canada and Southwest,China,we examined the commonalities and differences in secondary school Inquiry-based Teaching(IBT)in
会议
“探究”在杜威哲学中具有极其重要的地位,正是借由“探究”,杜威实现了对传统认识论科学化、实践化的改造,将“实验性的探究”置于认识论的内核,构建了“探究认识论”,从而扭转了传统认识论的“知识旁观者”困局,实现了对传统教育的革新。本文认为“探究”具有作为动因的“由问题情境引发的解题的需要”“实验性的亲历者认识论”的实质、“理智”的保障、“思维五阶段法”的模式与作为结果的“有根据的断言”五个维度并对其进
会议
本文通过观察中国重庆市人和街小学和加拿大温莎Talbot Trial 小学学生共同解决分数应用题,分析两国学生解决问题时运用的解题策略的异同。研究结果表明,中国学生倾向于独立解题,采用线段图法、转化法、直接列算式解决分数数学问题,聚焦题目的 数量关系,突出量的推理;加拿大学生采用的的解题策略是基于合作学习的图示法,关注问题情境,根据问题情境制定解题计划,突出质的推理。
数学解题活动包括学生从接触题目到得出解这个过程中的每一步骤和环节,本质上是学生思维活动的体现。中国和加拿大两国学生不同的解题活动能折射出解题教学在两国的实践与认识上的差异。本文通过对两国小学生分数问题解题活动的比较发现,加拿大小学生解题思维较灵活,解题表现为由直观理解问题到直观表达结果的过程。中国小学生解题思维较规范,过程表现为由数学化理解问题到数学化表达结果。两种风格迥异的解题活动互为有益补充,
In this paper,I present a Canadian teachers reciprocal learning narrative that has emerged on a Toronto-Shanghai Sister School partnership landscape under the support of the SSHRC funded Canada–China
选取加拿大Math Makes Sense(简写为MMS)和中国人教版两种版本的三年级小数数学教材中有关“分数的认识”为研究对象,采用内容分析法对两种版本教材中“分数的认识”内容和例题进行比较。研究结果表明:在内容上,两个版本教材所覆盖的知识范围有所不同;在单元结构方面,加拿大MMS 教材更注重板块和栏目的 设置。在例题情境方面,人教版侧重于数学内部情境,而加拿大教材的数学内部情境和个人生活情境比