论文部分内容阅读
随着网络游戏虚拟物品交易量的飞速增长,随之而来的盗窃、盗销网络游戏虚拟物品的盗窃犯罪亦愈演愈烈。盗窃所得的虚拟物品部分通过虚拟物品交易平台进行销售。由此,在产业界和法律界,对于虚拟物品交易平台的合法性产生了激烈的争议。虚拟物品交易平台被指为销赃平台,黑货集散地。本文通过分析虚拟物品交易平台交易模式——担保模式和寄售模式,研究了与之相关的法律关系,提出了应当对交易的虚拟物品承担权利瑕疵担保义务的是卖家,而非交易平台。交易平台在该两种交易模式下,担当的是居间人和受托人的角色,对交易的虚拟物品并不负有权利瑕疵担保义务。
With the rapid growth of the trading volume of virtual goods in online games, the ensuing theft and theft of cyber-games’ virtual goods are also intensifying. The theft of virtual goods part through the virtual goods trading platform for sale. As a result, in the industry and the legal community, the legitimacy of virtual goods trading platform has generated intense controversy. Virtual goods trading platform is referred to as stolen goods platform, black goods distribution center. By analyzing the trading patterns of virtual goods transaction platform - guarantee mode and consignment mode, this paper studies the related legal relationship and puts forward that it is the seller, not the trading platform that the obligation to guarantee the right of the virtual goods should be guaranteed. Under the two trading modes, the trading platform plays the role of intermediary and trustee, and does not bear the right guarantee obligation for the virtual goods traded.