请看一份试卷部分内容的批改。“爱不择手”的“释”字,教参原解“放”,学生答“放开”,一分不给; “自作自受”的“受”字,教参原解“承受”,学生答“负担”,一分不给; 一篇文章层次的分析,答案是几段,学生也应该是几段,否则,不分青红皂白,一律扣分。诸如此类,不胜枚举。由于受传统教育思想的影响和束缚,有些教师总是视教参为金科玉律。他们不许学生答案与它不一,否则,便认为考分没有客现标准,学生会“投机”。有的教师却坚决反对这样做。所以,改到试卷时,对此持不同看法的教师,往往各持己见,争执不下,弄得十分紧张。 Please look at the correction of part of the paper. The word “Shibu” of “love not to choose a hand” teaches the original solution to “dismiss”, and the student answers “release”, not giving one point; “accepted” character of “self-acceptance,” teaches the original solution “tolerate”, students Answer “burden”, do not give a point; An article level analysis, the answer is several paragraphs, the students should also be several paragraphs, otherwise, indiscriminate, all points deduction. And so on, the list goes on. Due to the influence and constraints of traditional education ideas, some teachers always regard it as a golden rule. They do not allow students to have different answers. Otherwise, they think that there is no standard for the score, and the students will “speculate”. Some teachers are firmly opposed to doing so. Therefore, when they changed to the test paper, teachers who had different opinions on this matter often held their own opinions and disputes, making them very nervous.