论文部分内容阅读
最近,有关利息税是否废除的讨论,涉及的问题主要有以下几方面:一是最早由北京一些经济学家和政协委员在“两会”上首先提出的观点,即取消利息税以减少消费者在通胀环境下的税负压力,从而改善消费者所承担的“负利率”状况;二是前一阶段当通货膨胀率连续突破央行年初所制定的通货膨胀目标时,有些学者和业内人士提出用取消利息税来代替央行的加息政策;三是印花税出台后股票市场所出现的过度反应,再次让人们过分地担心在通胀率居高不下的状态下,政府是否会取消利息税,它对股市是否会带来新一轮的利空冲击。
Recently, the discussion on whether the interest tax was abolished involves the following issues: First, the opinion first raised by some Beijing economists and members of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference on the “two sessions” that the interest tax will be canceled to reduce consumption The pressure of tax burden in the inflationary environment, so as to improve the “negative interest rate” that consumers bear. Second, when the inflation rate continuously breaks through the inflation target set by the central bank at the beginning of the previous period, some scholars and practitioners Proposed to cancel the interest rate tax instead of the central bank’s interest rate hike policy; third is the over-reaction in the stock market after the introduction of stamp duty, once again let people worry too much about whether the government will abolish the interest tax under the state of high inflation Whether the stock market will bring a new round of negative impact.