论文部分内容阅读
对于《刑法》第180条及《刑法修正案》第4条(1999年12月25日全国人大常委会通过)规定的证券、期货内幕交易犯罪行为,“两高”司法解释将其罪名确定为“内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪”。这一司法罪名,在刑法罪数理论上称之为概括罪名。在司法适用中,只能按一罪认定,不实行数罪并罚。而修订后的《刑法》第180条规定了证券内幕交易和期货内幕交易两种犯罪,则应分别确立罪名,按数罪论处。对此提出质疑,并就证券、期货中“内幕信息”的认定,犯罪主体范围的界定,内幕交易行为的样态等方面进行了探讨。
As for the criminal acts of securities and futures insider trading stipulated in Article 180 of the Criminal Law and Article 4 of the Criminal Law Amendment (passed by the NPC Standing Committee on December 25, 1999), the “two highs” judicial interpretations will be guilty of the charges Confirmed as “insider trading, divulging the crime of inside information ”. This charge of judicial conviction in criminal law theory is called summary crime. In the judicial application, only one crime can be found, and no multiple crimes can be taken. And Article 180 of the revised Criminal Law stipulates two types of crimes, including insider dealing in securities and insider dealing in futures, respectively. In addition, it also raised some questions about the recognition of the “insider information” in the securities and futures, the definition of the scope of the criminal subject, the style of insider trading and so on.