论文部分内容阅读
经济分析意见在反垄断诉讼中的涌现体现了技术权不断扩大的趋势。同时,反垄断法独特的知识构造也为经济分析意见提供了适用空间。当然,考察我国制度现实,经济分析意见尚无明确的证据法定位,相应的证据规则尚付阙如,这难免造成反垄断讼争中技术权与审判权的抵牾。而考察经济分析意见在域外证据法上的历史演进,专家证据制度应当作为适当归宿,为经济分析意见的规范化提供规则基础。在此基础上,还应当构建经济分析意见的可采性规则,为法官采证提供科学的标准。具体而言,经济分析意见的采证应当坚持专家适格规则、可靠性规则以及相关性规则。
The emergence of economic analysis opinions in antitrust litigation reflects the trend of expanding the right to technology. At the same time, the unique knowledge structure of antitrust law also provides a space for economic analysis. Of course, the reality of our country’s system is examined. There is no clear evidence for the position of evidence in the economic analysis. The corresponding rules of evidence are still not paid, which inevitably leads to the contradiction between the right of technology and the right of trial in antitrust litigation. While examining the historical evolution of economic analysis opinions in extraterritorial evidence law, the expert evidence system should be an appropriate destination for providing the rules basis for the standardization of economic analysis opinions. On this basis, the admissibility rules of economic analysis should also be constructed to provide scientific standards for the evidence collection of judges. Specifically, the evidence of economic analysis opinions should adhere to the expert’s fitness rules, reliability rules and the relevant rules.