论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究分析胃肠镜应用于消化内科临床诊断治疗的作用。方法:根据2009至2013年我院的84例消化内科患者来进行研究分析,共分成观察组和对照组两组,各有42例患者,观察组患者接受无痛胃肠镜检查,对照组接受普通胃肠镜检查,对两组患者的治疗效果和不良反应进行对比分析。结果:两种胃肠镜检查方式均可有效反映出病灶位置,诊断准确率较高,但对照组采用常规胃肠镜进行诊疗时,有18例患者由于无法耐受放弃检查,且不良反应发生率明显高于观察组,两组不良反应分别为50%、23.8%,对比有差异(P<0.05)。结论:临床中对消化内科患者使用胃肠镜检查,可以对患者的病情有比较清楚的了解,为临床治疗提供可靠信息,因此应用价值比较大,该诊断方式又有无痛和常规两种,其各有优缺点,前者的优点是痛苦小,但缺点是费用高,后者则正好相反,患者需要根据自己的需求来选择。
Objective: To study the role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of digestive diseases. Methods: According to 84 cases of digestive diseases in our hospital from 2009 to 2013, the patients were divided into observation group and control group, with 42 cases in each group. The observation group received painless gastrointestinal endoscopy and the control group received Common gastrointestinal endoscopy, the two groups of patients treated with adverse effects and comparative analysis. Results: Two kinds of gastrointestinal endoscopy can effectively reflect the location of the lesion, the diagnostic accuracy rate is high, but the control group when routine gastrointestinal endoscopic diagnosis and treatment, 18 patients were unable to tolerate give up the examination, and adverse reactions occurred The rates of adverse reactions in the two groups were 50% and 23.8% respectively, which were significantly different from those in the observation group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical use of gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with gastroenterology can provide a more clear understanding of the patient’s condition and provide reliable information for clinical treatment. Therefore, the application value is relatively large. There are two kinds of painless and routine diagnostic methods, Each has its advantages and disadvantages, the former advantage is painful, but the disadvantage is the high cost, while the latter is the opposite, the patient needs to be based on their needs to choose.