论文部分内容阅读
在对限制竞争协议的违法性认定中,并不存在普遍适用的本身违法规则与合理规则。本身违法规则和合理规则只是美国法院创造和发展起来的规则,是由美国立法本身的特征决定的。美国谢尔曼法一概禁止限制竞争协议,没有任何例外。欧共体竞争法对限制竞争协议采取了禁止与豁免/例外相结合的制度。中国面临的是美国模式与欧共体模式的选择,而不是本身违法与合理规则的选择。根据中国的法律制度及现有条件,欧共体模式可以提供借鉴指导作用。
In the competition agreement to restrict the illegal identification, there is no universally applicable rules of its own violations and reasonable rules. Their own rules of illegality and reasonable rules are only the rules created and developed by the U.S. courts. They are determined by the characteristics of the U.S. legislation itself. There are no exceptions to the U.S. Sherman Act that prohibits the restriction of competition agreements. The EC competition law has adopted a regime that prohibits the combination of exemptions / exceptions with regard to competition-restricting agreements. China is facing a choice between the U.S. model and the EC model rather than its own choice of law-breaking and reasonable rules. According to China’s legal system and existing conditions, the EC model can provide guidance and guidance.