本案中的《权利登记书》属于预约合同,性质上等同于认购书,仅约定房屋坐落、面积、价款,并未约定付款方式和时间、交付条件和时间等主要内容,该缺失条款仍然有赖于双方当事人的磋商。法院不宜判令双方当事人继续履行,强制订立商品房买卖合同。 The “registration of rights” in this case belongs to an appointment contract and is essentially the same as a subscription book. It only stipulates the location, area and price of the house, and does not stipulate the main contents such as the payment method and time, delivery conditions and time, and the missing clause still depends on Consultation between the two parties. The court should not order both parties to continue to perform and forcibly enter into a contract for the sale and purchase of commercial houses.