第70届奥斯卡金像奖最佳影片,不出所料的被《泰坦尼克号》夺取。《泰坦尼克号》这部电影的文学性和艺术性不在本文讨论的范围,但如果我们从管理角度来看该片,至少有三点值得人们学习的。第一,如果记不错,片中女主角曾经问过为什么豪华游轮上救生艇如此之少。不管答案如何,泰坦尼克初航的风险分析显然不够。一般来说,风险来自七个因素:技术为主的风险、专案核心小组人员能力不足的风险、法规条文的变更和不周的风险、临阵换将的风险、对手行为带来的风险、天灾人祸外在环境影响的风险及时间和成本估计错误的风险。有关救生艇不够的缺失,在当时的法令下,是否构成违法的行为,电影上没说,但设计者过分自信,没有问WHATIF就贸然开航,忽略天 The 70th Academy Award for the best film, was unexpectedly “Titanic” captured. The literary and artistic nature of Titanic is beyond the scope of this article, but at least three things are worth learning if we look at the film from a management perspective. First, if you remember well, the film heroine once asked why so many cruise ships on the lifeboat. No matter the answer, the risk analysis of Titanic’s first flight is obviously not enough. In general, the risk comes from seven factors: the risk of technology, the risk of inadequate capacity of the project core team, the change of regulatory provisions and the risk of unhealthy risk, the risk of changing behavior, the risk of rival behavior, natural disasters and man-made disasters The risk of external environmental impact and the risk of estimating the wrong time and cost. The lack of inadequate lifeboat under the then ordinance, constitute an illegal act, did not say in the movie, but the designer overconfident, without asking WHATIF on the rash start, ignoring the day