论文部分内容阅读
小说教学中对典型人物的分析,我们通常的做法是直接分析典型人物的言行;对主题思想和作者的写作意图的把握,一般是从主要人物人手顺藤摸瓜,加以归纳。这当然是正确的,也是可取的,但如果换一个视角去分析会怎么样呢?结论会相同吗?对此笔者通过《项链》的教学加以探究。《项链》刻画的典型人物是玛蒂尔德,笔者在带领学生阅读文本,围绕线索“项链”理清故事情节后,笔者没有像常规教学那样,引领学生从正面分析玛蒂尔
In the analysis of typical characters in the teaching of novels, our usual practice is to directly analyze the words and deeds of the typical characters. To grasp the theme and the writer’s intention of writing is generally to follow the principle of man from the main characters and sum up. Of course, this is correct and desirable. But what if the analysis would be from another perspective? Will the conclusion be the same? I will explore this through the teaching of “necklaces.” “Necklace” depicts the typical figure is Mathilde, the author lead the students to read the text, around the clue “necklace ” to sort out the story, the author did not like conventional teaching, leading students to positive analysis of Matilda