论文部分内容阅读
利用实测的大气观测数据建立陆面模式驱动场,分别驱动Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme(BATS),Land Surface Model(LSM),Common Land Model(CoLM)三个陆面模式,对新疆地区99个测站的陆面热力过程进行了off-line模拟研究,对比分析了三个模式模拟结果的异同,并利用观测的土壤温度检验了各个模式的模拟性能.结果表明:三个模式对所吸收的太阳辐射、地表感热通量、 地表潜热通量和Bowen比的模拟结果有明显差别,其中CoLM模拟的太阳辐射、 感热通量和土壤温度比BATS和LSM大.用观测的土壤温度对三个模式模拟性能的检验表明 BATS模拟的土壤温度最接近观测值,大约偏低1℃,而LSM和CoLM的模拟结果偏高,CoLM模拟的年际变化趋势与观测值相关性达到 0.877,高于另外两个模式的模拟;BATS在天山以北模拟值偏低,CoLM在天山以南模拟结果偏高,LSM模拟的区域分布状况与实际观测最一致.这些结果为研究陆面模式在新疆地区的应用提供了一些参考,对于深入了解新疆地区的陆面过程具有重要意义.“,”Three different land surface models including Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS),Land Surface Model (LSM) and Common Land Model (CoLM),were compared in off-line simulation study based on the same forcing dataset observed at 99 stations in Xinjiang Province,China. The simulated results showed that there were quite differences for absorbed solar radiation,sensible heat flux,latent heat flux,Bowen Ratio and soil temperature. Among these results,the values for solar radiation,sensible heat flux and soil temperatures obtained from CoLM were larger than the other two. The latent heat flux had increased in Xinjiang Province from 1960 to 2005 and the three simulated results were in the same shape. At last,the land surface models were verified through the dataset of the observed soil temperature. The soil temperature result from BATS was very close to the observed one,which was 1℃ lower,but the ones from other models were 2～3℃ higher. For temporal characteristics,the correlation coefficient from CoLM for the interannual trends between soil temperature and observations had the highest value of 0.877. For spatial characteristics,comparing with the soil temperature and the observed data,the results from BATS was lower,but the one from CoLM was higher in the north of Tianshan Mountain,Xinjiang Province. However,the spatial distribution curve from LSM was in good agreement with the observed land surface temperature curve. These results will provide some important references for researching the land surface process in Xinjiang.