论文部分内容阅读
李学勤先生《评陈梦家〈殷虚卜辞综述)》①(以下简称《评陈》),早在1957年发表,到现在已40多年了。陈先生早已作古,李先生对《评陈》的某些说法也有了改变,虽然,《评陈》对《综述》有很多批评,有些话还很重,也不应再作什么评论了。不过,事情并不那么简单,这一二十年来,学术界不时说到《评陈》,李先生自己有时也说到《评陈》,一般多是认同。前几年,裘锡圭先生发表《评〈殷虚卜辞综述)》②,是就中华书局重印《殷虚卜辞综述》发表的,用意是引导研究者和读者对此书的正确理解。文中引用和推荐《评陈》达14处之多,遍及《评陈》文的各部分。看来,这是要与《评陈》形成共同的合力,很富现实性。以上种种,与《综述》在甲骨学界、以至古文字学、历
Mr. Li Xueqin’s “Comment on Chen Mengji’s Summary of Yin Inscriptions” ① (hereinafter referred to as “Comment on Chen”), published as early as 1957, has been more than 40 years now. Mr. Chen has long ago made his way. Some of Mr. Lee’s comments on “criticizing Chen” have also been changed. Although “Criticizing Chen” criticized the “Summary,” some were still heavy and should not be criticized anymore. However, things are not that simple. In the past 20 years or so, academics have said “criticizing Chen” from time to time. Sometimes, Mr Lee himself refers to “criticizing Chen,” and mostly agree. A few years ago, Mr. Qiu Xigui published “Comment on Inscriptions on Yin Inscriptions”), which was published on the reprinting of Zhong Yin Inscriptions Summary by Zhonghua Book Company. The intention is to guide researchers and readers to understand the book correctly. The article cited and recommended “comment on Chen” up to as many as 14, throughout the “comment on Chen” text of the various parts. It seems that this is to form a joint force with “comment on Chen” and is very realistic. All of the above, and “review” in the Oracle community, as well as the ancient textology, calendar